![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The best rule for promise-keeping would be of the form: 'Always keep your promises except.'(where the list of exceptions would be very long). Suppose I am in Britain and know that people will generally keep to the left.Ought I really to keep to the right?Īnother problem is that the best rules would not be simple. According to rule-utilitarianism, I ought to keep to the right. But how ought one to act if people are not generally likely to follow that rule? To illustrate: suppose that for every country, the best traffic rule is to keep to the right. We can say that rule R is the best rule, and that everyone ought to follow that rule. Suppose the consequences of the general following of rule R are optimal. One problem with rule-utilitarianism is this: it invites us to consider the consequences of the general following of a particular rule. Among early proponents were John Austin ( The Province of Jurisprudence 1832) and John Stuart Mill ( Utilitarianism 1861). The rule the following of which has the best overall consequences is the best rule. This is done by finding the value of the consequences of following a particular rule. First, the best rule of conduct is found. "Instead of looking at the consequences of a particular act, rule- utilitarianism determines the rightness of an act by a different method. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |